free counter
World

Commuting by subway? The thing you need toknow about airquality

Four more major Indian cities will soon have their very own metro lines, the countrys government has announced. On the far side of the Himalayas, Shanghai is building its 15th subway line, set to open in 2020, adding 38.5km and 32stations to the worlds largest subway network. And New Yorkers can finally enjoy their Second Avenue Subway line after looking forward to almost 100 years for this to reach.

In Europe alone, commuters in a lot more than 60cities use rail subways. Internationally, a lot more than 120million people commute by them each day. We count around 4.8million riders each day in London, 5.3 million in Paris, 6.8million in Tokyo, 9.7million in Moscow and 10million in Beijing.

Subways are vital for commuting in crowded cities, a thing that will become a growing number of important as time passes in accordance with a US 2014 report, 1 / 2 of the worlds population is currently urban. They are able to also play a role in reducing outdoor polluting of the environment in large metropolises by assisting to reduce motor-vehicle use.

Huge amounts of breathable particles (particulate matter, or PM) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), stated in part by industrial emissions and road traffic, are responsible for shortening the lifespans of city dwellers. Public transportation systems such as for example subways have thus appeared like a solution to lessen polluting of the environment in the urban environment.

But what’s the air like this we breathe underground, on the rail platforms and inside trains?

Mixed quality of air

During the last decade, several pioneering studies have monitored subway quality of air across a variety of cities in Europe, Asia and the Americas. The database is incomplete, but keeps growing and has already been valuable.

Subway, Tokyo, 2016. Mildiou/Flickr, CC BY-SA

For instance, comparing quality of air on subway, bus, tram and walking journeys from exactly the same origin to exactly the same destination in Barcelona, revealed that subway air had higher degrees of polluting of the environment than in trams or walking in the pub, but slightly less than those in buses. Similar lower values for subway environments in comparison to other public transport modes have already been demonstrated by studies in HongKong, MexicoCity, Istanbul and Santiago de Chile.

Of wheels and brakes

Such differences have already been related to different wheel materials and braking mechanisms, in addition to to variations in ventilation and air-con systems, but could also relate with differences in measurement campaign protocols and selection of sampling sites.

Second Avenue Subway in the making, NY, 2013. MTA Capital Construction/Rehema Trimiew/Wikimedia, CC BY-SA

Key factors influencing subway polluting of the environment includes station depth, date of construction, kind of ventilation (natural/air conditioning), forms of brakes (electromagnetic or conventional brake pads) and wheels (rubber or steel) applied to the trains, train frequency and much more recently the presence or lack of platform screen-door systems.

Specifically, much subway particulate matter is sourced from moving train parts such as for example wheels and brake pads, along with from the steel rails and power-supply materials, making the particles dominantly iron-containing.

Up to now, there is absolutely no clear epidemiological indication of abnormal health effects on underground workers and commuters. NewYork subway workers have already been subjected to such air without significant observed impacts on the health, no increased threat of lung cancer was found among subway train drivers in the Stockholm subway system.

But an email of caution is struck by the observations of scholars who discovered that employees focusing on the platforms of Stockholm underground, where PM concentrations were greatest, tended to possess higher degrees of risk markers for coronary disease than ticket sellers and train drivers.

The dominantly ferrous particles are blended with particles from the selection of other sources, including rock ballast from the track, biological aerosols (such as for example bacteria and viruses), and air from the outside, and driven through the tunnel system on turbulent air currents generated by the trains themselves and ventilation systems.

Comparing platforms

Probably the most extensive measurement programme on subway platforms up to now has been completed in the Barcelona subway system, where 30 stations with differing designs were studied beneath the frame of IMPROVE LIFE project with additional support from the AXA Research Fund.

It reveals substantial variations in particle-matter concentrations. The stations with only a single tunnel with one rail track separated from the platform by glass barrier systems showed typically half the concentration of such particles in comparison to conventional stations, without any barrier between your platform and tracks. The usage of air-conditioning has been proven to create lower particle-matter concentrations inside carriages.

In trains where you’ll be able to open the windows, such as for example in Athens, concentrations could be shown generally to improve in the train when passing through tunnels and much more specifically once the train enters the tunnel at high speed.

In accordance with their construction material, you might breath different sort of particles on various platforms worldwide. London Tube/Wikimedia, CC BY-SA

Monitoring stations

Although you can find no existing legal controls on quality of air in the subway environment, research ought to be moving towards realistic ways of mitigating particle pollution. Our experience in the Barcelona subway system, using its considerable selection of different station designs and operating ventilation systems, is that every platform has its specific atmospheric micro environment.

To create solutions, one will have to consider local conditions of every station. Only then can researchers measure the influences of pollution generated from moving train parts.

Such research continues to be growing and can increase as subway operating companies are actually more aware of how cleaner air leads right to better health for city commuters.


Created in 2007, the Axa Research Fund supports a lot more than 500projets all over the world conducted by researchers from 51countries. For more information concerning the work of Fulvio Amato, go to the dedicated site.

Read More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker