The other day, circumstances judge in New Mexico issued a vastly important ruling, removing Couy Griffin from his position as a county commissioner in Otero County and banning him from ever holding public office again. Griffins crime? The Cowboys for Trump founder was convicted of experiencing participated in the January 6 insurrection, and the judge discovered that his public rhetoric in the times before it had clearly encouraged visitors to disobey regulations within their efforts to avoid a peaceful transfer of power.
Exactly the same week, a Trump-appointed judge in Florida issued a ruling granting the former presidents request to appoint a particular master to oversee the investigation into his hoarding of ” inside info ” government documents in his Mar-a-Lago basementa ruling so legally flimsy therefore transparently political that even Trumps erstwhile legal wingman Bill Barr choked on his breakfast cereal when he read it. For the reason that light, your choice against Griffin was refreshingly to the stage. Judge Francis Mathew wrote that Griffins argumentsthat he was only exercising his First Amendment rights to free speech and hadnt planned or done anything illegalwere so nefarious they were comparable to wanting to put lipstick on a pig.
Which raises the question: In case a lowly Cowboy for Trump, in a sparsely populated county in rural New Mexico, could be banned forever from holding public office due to his rhetoric and actions around January 6, how come the instigator in chief of a continuing assault contrary to the countrys democratic system of governance not already facing exactly the same penalty?
News outlets have reported that in recent days the Department of Justice has issued about 40 subpoenas to Trump associates, concerning the events of January 6. It has additionally seized the mobile phones of two close Trump aides.
Piece by piece, the Justice Department appears to be accumulating a slew of cases contrary to the grifting, authoritarian ex-president. Donald Trump may yet be charged with miscellaneous offenses, and its own still possible that hell ultimately be convicted and barred from holding public office again. For the time being, the risks to American democracy continue steadily to grow, and Trumps malignant influence is still felt.
A fresh book by NY Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman alleges that, after losing the 2020 election, Trump told associates he simply wouldnt leave the White House. However far-fetched this idea may have been, the temper-tantrum sentiments behind it continue steadily to resonate with a massive swath of the GOP electorate. In primary after primary, the GOPs base has, these past months, chosen extremist election deniers as candidates for local, state, and national office. Consequently, six in 10 voters round the country could have the opportunity of voting for an election denier on the ballots November, in accordance with an analysis by FiveThirtyEight.
All told, FiveThirtyEight discovered that 200 of the GOPs 541 nominees for state or national office were full-bore election deniers, and hundreds more had serious questions concerning the 2020 election. Even liberal California, where Governor Newsom is outpolling his GOP rival state Senator Brian Dahle by nearly two-to-one margins, isnt immune. The analysis discovered that 12 election deniers are running for office in the Golden State.
Unlike neighboring Arizona, however, where high-profile election-denying candidates are running competitively for all of us senate, governor, attorney general, and the secretary of states office, California isnt vulnerable to having election deniers responsible for its political system and its own electoral machinery come January 2023.
Actually, Newsom, who knows that, barring an off-the-Richter-scale political earthquake, he’ll romp home to reelection, now looks to create his sights on the national political stage come 2024 or 2028. Week on week he’s got made a spot of signing legislation which has the potential to shore up his political standing with a national audience on the next couple of years.
This Wednesday, the governor signed SB 1338 into law. Officially titled the city Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, the legislation mandates counties to supply meaningful mental health services to homeless mentally ill residents; simultaneously, it obliges the mentally ill to simply accept those services. Put simply, it returns some coercion to the partnership between county authorities and the homeless mentally ill that is largely lacking for days gone by many years.
Newsoms office believes that with this particular legislation they will have an insurance plan winner: The CARE Act is section of a $15 billion state investment targeted at tackling homelessness, and a far more than $11 billion annual investment in mental health services. Thats no small change even for circumstances like California with a multitrillion-dollar economy. If, on the coming years, these investments create a significant dent in the us scandalous homeless crisis, it’ll be a large, and incredibly visible, policy victory for the governor.
The CARE Act divides progressives in California. Some applaud it for the serious investment that it creates in expanding required mental health services; but others are deeply suspicious of the required, coercive nature of the procedure. The National Alliance on Mental Illness is all in on the CARE Courts, however the ACLU is simply as strongly opposed.
You can find powerful arguments on both sides of the debate. (Full disclosure: Given the scale of the task and the serious public health dangers posed by sprawling shantytowns, I believe the arguments and only CARE courts outweigh those against.) But whats beyond dispute is that Californias horrific in-your-face homelessness crisis, the images of shantytowns and the stories of seriously mentally ill homeless people camped out on view round the state, will undoubtedly be used to undermine Newsom if he ever runs for the presidency. Hes determined, because of this, to obtain a handle on a calamitous policy failurearound housing, mental illness, and the reintegration of ex-prisoners, way too many of whom find yourself on the streetsthat has been building to a crescendo for many years.