free counter
Business

Heres WHAT THINGS TO FIND OUT ABOUT Trumps Document Controversy That RESULTED IN Mar-A-Lago Raid

Topline

The FBI executed a raid on former President Donald Trumps Mar-A-Lago estate on Monday, the ex-president confirmed, an explosive step that came after months of increasing scrutiny in to the boxes of White House documents that Trump took with him to Florida after his presidency ended and questions over whether that violated federal law.

The calm prior to the storm: the entrance to former President Donald Trumps Mar-A-Lago estate on … [+] August 8, in Palm Beach, Florida.

Associated Press

KEY POINTS

The National Archives said in February that it had arranged for the transport of 15 boxes of White House documents from Mar-A-Lago which should have already been turned to the Archives rather than left Washington, D.C.which included classified national security information.

Trump reportedly held to the documents for months and only turned them over when he was threatened with legal action, multiple outlets report.

Trumps removal of the documents could violate the Presidential Records Act, which requires documents to be preserved and turned to the Archives, plus a federal statute prohibiting willfully and unlawfully conceal[ing], remov[ing], mutilat[ing], obliterat[ing], or destroy[ing] any government property.

The Archives reportedly asked the Department of Justice to research Trump taking the recovered documents to Mar-A-Lago in February and the agency was probing the problem by April, the Washington Post reported at that time, and a grand jury was convened in the event and issued subpoenas by May.

Investigators reportedly traveled to Mar-A-Lago in June seeking more info concerning the documents and where these were being stored, CNN reports, and Trump aides were interviewed in April and could regarding the the probe.

The raid conducted on Monday was to make sure that there werent any documents quit at Mar-A-Lago that the FBI hadnt recovered, a source acquainted with the investigation told CNNnoting agents took boxes of items with themand Trumps son Eric Trump said on Fox News he was told the National Archives wished to . . . corroborate whether Donald Trump had any documents in his possession.

What We Dont Know

What punishments Trump will face, if any. The Presidential Records Act doesnt already have an enforcement mechanism and therefore wouldnt bring about any charges against Trump if he violated it, legal experts told CNN. The federal statute prohibiting the removal or destruction of government property posesses punishment of an excellent or more to 3 years in prison. In addition, it specifies that whoever violates it must be barred from holding public officebut its unclear whether that pertains to the presidency, and several legal experts believe it could not, and the problem is more likely to get litigated in court if Trump is charged for violating that statute. Its also still possible that Trump could face other charges in link with the documents, CNN notes, such as for example obstruction of justice, that could carry harsher penalties.

Surprising Fact

The timing of the raid might have been linked to an FBI rule that advises against politically sensitive moves within 90 days of an election, former prosecutor Elie Honig told CNN. Another election is on November 8, 92 days following the raid occurred on Monday.

Chief Critic

Trump has strongly opposed the FBI raid on his home and heatedly denied any wrongdoing. Nothing beats it has ever happened to a President of america before, Trump said Monday. After working and cooperating with the relevant Government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home had not been necessary or appropriate.

Key Background

Trump issued a statement Monday night announcing that the FBI had raided Mar-a-Lago that day, with later reports and Eric Trump confirming the probe was devoted to the documents he previously brought with him to the estate. Obtaining federal search warrants just like the one which FBI agents could have had a need to search Mar-A-Lago need a judge to concur that theres probable reason behind a crime and that there will be evidence at the area being searched. The NY Times notes its likely high-ranking officials at the DOJ, such as for example Attorney General Merrick Garland, would likewise have had to sign off on the raid for this to move forward. Former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade told Bloomberg the raid were the 1st time a warrant has ever been executed for a former presidents home, noting, Even President Nixon received a subpoena for his recordings. The episode came as Trump comes under broader legal scrutiny, however, with the DOJ also investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol building and the events before ita probe thats reportedly increasingly focusing on Trump himself and his actions following a 2020 presidential election.

Further Reading

FBI Agents Search Mar-A-Lago In Unannounced Raid, Trump Says (Forbes)

Assessing Trump’s risk if he mishandled White House documents (CNN)

What we realize, and what we dont know, concerning the FBIs raid on Donald Trump (Vox)

Grand Jury Investigating Trumps Transfer Of White House Records To Mar-A-Lago, Report Says (Forbes)

National Archives Says It Found Classified National Security Information In Boxes At Mar-A-Lago (Forbes)

Read More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker