free counter
World

Immigrant advocates pan scope of eligibility for new Dreamers rule

Posted August 26, 2022 at 2: 19pm

Immigrant advocates criticized the Biden administrations new rule to strengthen the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which aims to preserve the embattled program amid legal challenges but will not expand eligibility to younger immigrants.

Throughout a press call Thursday, advocates from immigrant groups condemned the administrations decision to leave set up eligibility requirements organized in the initial 2012 Homeland Security Department memo creating this program. DACA protects a lot more than 600,000 so-called Dreamers from deportation and allows them to call home and work legally in the U.S.

However the rule requires DACA applicants to possess found its way to the U.S. before June 2007 to qualify, which bars young immigrants who found its way to days gone by 15 years. Applicants also will need to have been younger than 16 if they entered.

In accordance with a written report published in-may by the advocacy group FWD.us, the majority of the 100,000 undocumented students who graduated this season are ineligible.

Yesterday’s rule essentially takes the DACA program from 2012 and turns it right into a fossil, said Karen Tumlin, founder and director of the Justice Action Center. That’s as the rule essentially codified the 2012 memo without expanding dates for eligibility, despite the fact that we have been rapidly approaching as soon as where no new applicant could apply.

For the moment, the unchanged eligibility requirements dont have an instantaneous impact due to a July 2021 court ruling that blocked the DACA program from accepting new applicants. The ruling preserved the power of current applicants to renew their protection.

An appeals court heard oral arguments if so in July and happens to be weighing the entire programs fate.

Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., chairman of the Senate Judiciarys immigration subcommittee, chastised the Homeland Security Department for not going further in its rulemaking but acknowledged the role of Congress in providing permanent protection for “Dreamers.”

While I’d have liked to possess seen DACA eligibility expanded and for other reforms to be produced to this program, its clear Congress must do something, Padilla said.

Lawmakers have repeatedly didn’t enshrine protections for Dreamers into law. Late this past year, Democrats tried to add legislative protections for undocumented immigrants in a sweeping budget reconciliation package, however the proposal was nixed by the Senate parliamentarian.

In March 2021, the home passed a bill to supply a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers, however the Senate have not considered that bill.

Through the press call, immigrant advocates suggested that lawmakers’ failure to enact protections for “Dreamers” could imperil their electoral success.

If we get into 2023, 2024, and you can find teenagers, immigrant teenagers with DACA losing their protection, being detained or deported every one of these things are on the Biden administration and Democrats, said Bruna Sollod, communications director at United We Dream, an advocacy group for immigrant youth. We shall ensure that they understand that each and every detention, deportation has their name stamped onto it.

Read More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker