free counter

Justice Department subpoenas a large number of Trump aides in apparent escalation of investigation, in accordance with reports

The investigation of Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 election and the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021, is separate from the seizure of documents from Mar-a-Lago.


  • The Justice Department subpoenaed a large number of Trump aides and seized at the very least two phones.
  • Some subpoenas sought information from individuals who challenged the 2020 election results.
  • Some subpoenas centered on Trump fundraisers and organizers of his rally prior to the Capitol riot.

WASHINGTON The Justice Department issued a large number of subpoenas to Donald Trumps aides and associates for information regarding the 2020 election and the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021, in accordance with THE BRAND NEW York Times and CNN.

The flurry of subpoenas suggested the investigation, that is separate from the seizure of Trump administration documents from Mar-a-Lago, is picking right up pace.

At the very least two Trump aides,Boris Epshteyn and Mark Roman, had their phones seized as evidence, based on the Times. Epshteyn declined comment.

The subpoenas shop around concerning the Trump campaign’s intend to organize alternate slates of electors in states President Joe Biden won. Epshteyn had copied on emails in late 2020from Trump lawyer John Eastman, who developed the program.

Eastman was already subpoenaed and had his phone seized. Eastman earlierrefused to answer questions from the home panel investigating the Capitol attack or perhaps a grand jury in Georgia predicated on his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Another subpoena recipient was Bernard Kerik, the former NEW YORK police commissioner, who coordinated the investigation ofclaims of voter fraud with Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

Keriks lawyer, Timothy Parlatore, told USA TODAY that Kerik was ready to testify to federal investigators as he previously already prior to the House committee. Kerikhad already turned over types of probable case of election fraud to the Justice Department for further investigation in late 2020, Parlatore said.

Former Attorney General Bill Barr has testified to the home panel that the department found no evidence to aid the Trump campaign’s claims of widespread fraud.

Parlatore said the department’s latest subpoena read as though the existing investigation had no focus and asked Kerik about names he didnt recognize.

The standard DOJ subpoena appears like rifle shots, Parlatore said. This appears like a lot of scatter-shot shotgun blasts, almost just like a spray-and-pray mindset.

The most recent subpoenas included someone to Dan Scavino, Trumps former social-media director, based on the Times. Trump promoted his fundraising to fight the outcomes of the 2020 election and his rally the morning of Jan. 6 through social media marketing. Scavinos lawyer, Stanley Woodward Jr., declined comment.

Other people who were subpoenaed include former Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien and Sean Dollman, the campaign’s chief financial officer, in accordance with CNN.

The Justice Department declined touch upon the subpoenas.

The investigation is separate fromthe seizure of Trump administration documents, including a large number of classified records, from Mar-a-Lago. For the reason that probe, federal investigators said these were looking for proof violations of the Espionage Act for mishandling national defense documents or of obstruction of justice.

More: Will Trump or his allies face charges over Jan. 6? Legal experts explain hurdles DOJ faces

The investigation can be separate, but overlapswith an area investigation in Fulton County, Georgia. District Attorney Fani Willis has convened a particular grand jury to research fake electors along with other potential election fraud by Trump and his campaign. The grand jury has subpoenaed Eastman andGiuliani, amongst others.

The Justice Department earlier declined without explanation to press charges against Scavino or former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows over defying subpoenas from the home committee investigating the attack. However the department charged Trump political strategist Steve Bannon, who was simply convicted of contempt, and former trade adviser Peter Navarro, who awaits trial.

Read More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker