free counter
Science And Nature

Poll: Arizonans desire to ban uranium mining close to the Grand Canyon

A fresh poll of likely voters in Arizona signals strong, bipartisan support for a permanent ban on new uranium mining close to the Grand Canyon and expect the passing of the Grand Canyon Protection Act, a bill that could permanently ban the practice.

Conducted by GQR, a polling and opinion research firm, 600 registered Arizona voters were asked specific questions concerning the Grand Canyon Protection Act, which passed the home this past year but has yet to pass the Senate. Sixty-seven percent of these voters said they supported the act while 46 percent said they strongly supported the act. Only 15 percent opposed the ban. On protecting the states clean water supply, 96 percent of Arizonans say its a high priority, the poll indicates.

If you want to truly protect this treasure, Arizonas water, and individuals who depend on that water to call home, we are in need of permanent protections set up to really have the force of law, said House Natural Resources Committee Chair Ral M. Grijalva, writer of the act.

Advocates say that the Grand Canyon houses only a small percentage of the U.S. known uranium reserves and a permanent ban wouldn’t normally impact national security or the economy. Mining proponents say that U.S. uranium production is essential for energy independence, a solid economy, and national defense.

In 2012, Secretary of the inside Ken Salazar enacted a 20-year ban on new uranium mining on roughly one million acres of federal land round the Grand Canyon. The two-decade ban was designed to give scientists time and energy to study the potential impact of uranium mining on the spot. Since that time, the mining industry, which holds a huge selection of active mine claims in your community, has tried to overturn the ban in court unsuccessfully.

In 2018, nearly two-dozen members of Congress sent a letter asking President Trump to reopen the Grand Canyon to uranium mining. The letter, that was endorsed by a large number of mining and economic organizations, claimed that domestic uranium was imperative to national security, economic growth, and manufacturing. Based on the letter, a uranium ban in the Grand Canyon area would cost local economies both money and jobs, along with adding potential burden to domestic energy production. Because the war in Ukraine began, more pro-mining groups have needed a rise in domestic uranium production.

Anyone who claims that people have to be in a position to mine for uranium close to the Grand Canyon to become independent of Russia reaches best exaggerating the uranium potential of the region and perhaps only seizing on a geopolitical crisis to benefit their very own important thing, said Amber Reimondo, Grand Canyon Trust Energy Director.

Based on the Grand Canyon Trust, the U.S. has enough uranium stockpiled to provide military needs until 2060, and that the spot contains less-than one percent of U.S. uranium reserves, meaning production in the Grand Canyon would play a marginal role in the regional and national economy.

Outdoor recreation and tourism devoted to the Grand Canyon areas natural resources are major drivers of the regional economy, supporting over 9,000 jobs and generating over $160 million in annual state and local tax revenues. Based on the Grand Canyon Trust, mining could threaten the complete industry.

In this place, whether you imagine of it from the standpoint of the tribes, the standpoint of the wildlife, the standpoint of water, or the standpoint of the economy, uranium mining just doesnt seem sensible, said Scott Garlid, Executive Director of the Arizona Wildlife Federation.

Earlier this season, Energy Fuels Pinyon Plains mine was approved by way of a federal judge since it was permitted prior to the ban went into effect. The U.S. Forest Service estimates that the mine site has around 1.6 million a great deal of ore. Full mining operations have yet to begin with, but Stuart Chavez, a council person in the Havasupai Tribe, says that some tribal members have stopped picking medicinal plants like sagebrush close to the mine since they believe radiation has made the plants unsafe. For all of us the tainting of the positioning has recently happened.

Within an email, Curtis Moore, Vice President of Marketing and Corporate Development at Energy Fuels, said there is no credible evidence that the Pinyon Plain mine has caused, or is causing, any adverse impacts to plants, wildlife, air, or water. If people understood how low-impact, safe, healthy and responsible modern uranium mining is, and how dependent the U.S. is on Russia and China for the uranium and critical minerals, many reasonable people may have another view, he said.

After fighting against uranium mining for many years, the Havasupai Tribe say theyre hopeful. Im happy to know that people finally have the voices of Arizona joining the Havasupai tribe in this fight, said Carletta Tilousi, a Havasupai tribal leader.


Read More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker