The Kremlin has given a curt response when asked about Joe Biden‘s warning that the Russian leader shouldn’t resort to weapons of mass destruction in his invasion of Ukraine.
Biden was asked by CBS News in what his message is always to Putin if he felt the ultimate way to retaliate and wrest back the initiative is always to use chemical or tactical nuclear weapons.
The U.S. president replied “don’t, don’t, don’t” adding that this action would “change the facial skin of war unlike anything since World War Two”.
When asked for his reaction to the exchange Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Saturday, “Browse the doctrine. Everything is written there,” RIA Novosti reported.
Russia’s nuclear doctrine says nuclear weapons use might follow “an aggression against Russia or its ally by using mass destruction weapons” or if the united states faced aggression “once the very existence of hawaii is under threat.”
During the period of the war, there’s been mixed messaging via Moscow concerning the prospect of nuclear weapons being deployed.
Immediately after he launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Putin put his nuclear forces on high alert. Guests and anchors of state television channels which reflect Kremlin thinking have frequently described Russia’s nuclear capabilities and the chance of these use within its war effort.
However, Russia’s Defence Minister Sergey Shoigu said last month that nuclear weapons weren’t necessary from the military perspective and that “the primary objective of Russia’s nuclear arsenal would be to hold down nuclear attacks.”
Peskov, along with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, have previously said only conventional weapons will be found in Ukraine.
Russia has around 6,000 nuclear warheads, in accordance with the Federation of American Scientists.
Tactical nuclear weapons may be used at relatively short distances while “strategic” nuclear weapons could be launched over a lot longer distances and improve the prospect of all-out nuclear war.
Speculating keeps growing over what Putin would do next following a humiliating retreat in Ukraine’s northeastern Kharkiv region and confronted with a shortage of manpower.
Rose Gottemoeller, NATO‘s deputy secretary general from 2016 to 2019, previously told Newsweek she was concerned Putin might resort to a weapon of mass destruction (WMD), like a nuclear, chemical or biological weapon.
But there’s skepticism over whether this type of move will be in Putin’s interest.
“A nuclear strike could have a shock effect nonetheless it is unlikely to deter Ukraine, also it would merely serve to unify the West and cause Russian allies like China to cool off,” said Peter Rutland, professor of Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies, at Wesleyan University, Connecticut.