Is it possible to believe the FCC and the wireless industry trade association if they claim theres no risk with 5G wireless, especially given that they havent funded any safety studies? Why Brussels and Belgium halted their testing and Switzerland is delaying its 5G rollout amid 2,000 studies showing harm.
Contact with electromagnetic field (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) radiation can be an ever-growing health risk in today’s world. The MOBILE PHONE Task Force website1includes a long set of governments and organizations which have issued warnings or banned wireless technologies of varied kinds and under various circumstances, starting in 1993.
Another long set of organizations representing doctors and scientists may also be included in this, including an appeal for protection from nonionizing EMF exposure by a lot more than 230 international EMF scientists to the US in 2015, which notes that: 2
Numerous recent scientific publications show that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines.
Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, upsurge in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system,3,4,5learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the people, as there’s growing proof harmful effects to both plant and animal life.
A require a moratorium on 5G specifically was issued in September 2017 by a lot more than 180 scientists and doctors from 35 countries,6,7until potential hazards for human health insurance and the environment have already been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry, noting that RF-EMF has shown to be harmful for humans and the surroundings, and that 5G will substantially increase contact with radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) along with the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already set up.
Within an article8on environmentally friendly Health Trusts website, Ronald Powell, Ph.D., a retired Harvard scientist of applied physics, notes there is absolutely no SAFE Solution to implement 5G inside our communities; rather you can find only bad ways and worse ways,’ and instead of argue about who must have control over its deployment, we ought to concentrate on preventing its employment altogether.
HEALTH ISSUES Over 5G Abound
Wall Street analyst Sunil Rajgopal also warned that mounting health issues may delay the implementation of 5G.9Some countries have previously taken steps to slow 5G deployment because of health threats, Rajgopal notes. The question is, could it be stopped?
5G testing was halted in Brussels, Belgium,10and Switzerland is delaying its 5G rollout to be able to develop a system to monitor radiation.11Syracuse, NY, is also wanting to create some safeguards and contains negotiated the proper to conduct on-demand safety inspections of 5G antennas, to allay public concerns.12In accordance with Forbes: 13
In New Hampshire, lawmakers are thinking about establishing a commission to review medical impacts of 5G networks. And Mill Valley, Calif., near SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, this past year banned new 5G wireless cells.
A great many other areas, however, have chosen to trust the Federal Communications Commission and the wireless industry trade association, CTIA, which includes created a Cellphone Health Facts website citing research showing no risk. However, if you were to think the FCC is assessing health threats, youd be wrong.
At a Senate commerce hearing (above), the FCC admitted that no 5G safety studies have already been conducted or funded by the agency or the telecom industry, and that none are planned.14,15In a speech given at the National Press Club in June 2016, Tom Wheeler, former FCC chairman and prior head of the wireless industry lobbying group, made the agencys stance clear when he said: 16
Stay taken care of of technological development. Unlike some countries, we usually do not believe we have to spend another year or two studying Turning innovators loose is far better letting committees and regulators define the near future. We wont await the standards
In light of the a lot more than 2,000 studies showing an array of biological harm from EMFs, assurances from the FCC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that wireless radiation exposures, including 5G, is safe, seem disingenuous at best. As noted in a Counterpunch article: 17
Telecom lobbyists assure us that guidelines already set up are adequate to safeguard the general public. Those safety guidelines, however, derive from a 1996 study of just how much a cellular phone heated the top of an adult-sized plastic mannequin. That is problematic, for at the very least three reasons:
- living organisms contain highly complicated and interdependent cells and tissue, not plastic.
- those exposure to radiofrequency radiation include fetuses, children, plants, and wildlife not only adult male humans.
- the frequencies found in the mannequin study were less compared to the exposures connected with 5G.
However, in 2022, substantial research on EMF safety has yet to be achieved. In fact, by August 1, 2022, greater than 35,000 articles on EMFs, only seven have already been medical or biological studies.18However, none of the studies modulated or pulsed the signal as required by 5G or used other top features of 5G technology, in accordance with Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., director for the biggest market of Family and Community Health School of Public Health at UC Berkeley.19
What Degree of EMF Can Humans Withstand?
EMF exposure at many biological impacting frequencies, such as for example the ones that run cellphones and Wi-Fi, has increased about 1 quintillion times in the last 100 years.20,21Unfortunately, EMF exposure is indeed widespread nowadays, its virtually impossible to conduct controlled population studies anymore, as no population is actually unexposed or unaffected. This insufficient a control group helps it be very difficult to find out what the real-world effects are.
Having said that, one controlled exposure study has been done, revealing its nowhere near as harmless as people think. At the start of the 20th century, there have been two populations in the usa rural and urban. Cities were more often than not electrified, while rural areas weren’t electrified until around 1950.
Dr. Sam Milham, an epidemiologist, painstakingly analyzed mortality statistics between both of these populations as time passes, clearly showing there is a broad difference in mortality from cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes between both of these groups. Then, as rural areas became electrified, both curves merged.
Today, we not merely live and work in electrified surroundings, were also surrounded by microwaves from wireless technologies. Soon, 5G could be put into the mix, making exposures even more complex and potentially harmful. As noted by Counterpunch: 22
5G radiofrequency (RF) radiation runs on the cocktail of three forms of radiation, which range from relatively low-energy radio waves, microwave radiation with a lot more energy, and millimeter waves with vastly more energy
The extremely high frequencies in 5G are where in fact the biggest danger lies. While 4G frequencies go as high as 6 GHz, 5G exposes biological life to pulsed signals in the 30 GHz to 100 GHz range. Everyone hasn’t before been subjected to such high frequencies for extended periods of time.
HEALTH ISSUES Associated with 5G Exposure
The added concern 5G brings may be the addition of the millimeter wave (MMW). This bandwidth, which runs from 30 gigahertz (GHz) to 300GHz,23may penetrate around 2 millimeters into human skin tissue,24,25causing a burning sensation.
That is the key reason why MMW was chosen for used in crowd control weapons (Active Denial Systems) by the U.S. Department of Defense.26MMW can be found in so-called naked body scanners at airports.27
Research shows sweat ducts in human skin become receptors or antennae for 5G radiation, drawing rays in to the body,28,29,30,31,32thereby causing a growth in temperature. This partly helps explain the painful effect. As noted by Dr. Yael Stein who has studied 5G MMW technology and its own interaction with our body in a 2016 letter to the Federal Communications Commission: 33
Computer simulations have demonstrated that sweat glands concentrate sub-terahertz waves in human skin. Humans could sense these waves as heat. The usage of sub-terahertz (millimeter wave) communications technology (cellphones, Wi-Fi, antennas) might lead to humans to percept physical pain via nociceptors.
Potentially, if 5G Wi-Fi is spread in the general public domain we might expect more of medical effects currently seen with RF/ microwave frequencies including a lot more cases of hypersensitivity (EHS), in addition to many new complaints of physical pain and a yet unknown selection of neurologic disturbances.
You’ll be able showing a causal relationship between G5 technology and these specific health effects. The individuals may be qualified to receive compensation.
MMW in addition has been associated with: 34,35,36,37,38
- Eye problems such as for example lens opacity in rats, that is from the production of cataracts,39and eye damage in rabbits40,41
- Impacted heartrate variability, an indicator of stress, in rats42,43,44and heartrate changes (arrhythmias) in frogs45,46
- Suppressed immune function48
- Depressed growth and increased antibiotic resistance in bacteria49
As noted in a Gaia.com article: 50
Many scientists recognize that the electromagnetic radiation leaking through the doors of our microwave ovens are carcinogenic, and for that reason, could cause cancer. Many of these scientists also think that these waves are mutagenic, meaning they change the DNA structure of living beings.51
The launch of 5G will undoubtedly be much like turning on your own microwave, opening its door, and leaving it on for the others you will ever have. Theres justification why a huge selection of scientists are taking action contrary to the wireless industry.
Understanding EMFs Mechanisms of Harm
As explained in byMartin Pall, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of biochemistry and basic medical sciences at Washington State University, the principal threat of EMFs generally is that it causes excess oxidative stress that results in mitochondrial dysfunction.
In accordance with Palls research,52,53,54,55radiofrequency microwave radiation such as for example that from your own cellphone and wireless router activates the voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) situated in the outer membrane of one’s cells.
In accordance with Pall, VGCCs are 7.2 million times more sensitive to microwave radiation compared to the charged particles outside and inside our cells, this means the safety standards because of this exposure are off by way of a factor of 7.2 million.
Low-frequency microwave radiation opens your VGCCs, thereby allowing an abnormal influx of calcium ions in to the cell, which activates nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide which react nearly instantaneously to create peroxynitrite56that then causes carbonate free radicals, which are probably the most damaging reactive nitrogen species known and regarded as a real cause for most of todays chronic diseases.
For an in-depth knowledge of peroxynitrites and the harm they inflict, see Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health insurance and Disease57 a 140-page free access paper with 1,500 references compiled by Dr. Pal Pacher, Joseph Beckman and Dr. Lucas Liaudet.
Among its most crucial hazards of peroxynitrite is that it damages DNA. The European REFLEX study published in 2004 revealed the nonthermal ramifications of 2G and 3G radiation are in fact nearly the same as the consequences of X-rays with regards to the genetic damage they cause.58
The body can repair that damage by way of a category of 17 different enzymes collectively called poly ADP ribose polymerases (PARP). However, while PARP work very well, they might need NAD+ for fuel so when they go out of NAD+ they stop repairing your DNA.
Therefore can result in premature cell death, since 100 to 150 NAD+ molecules are essential to repair an individual DNA strand break. NAD+ is central to maintaining cellular and mitochondrial health, therefore the proven fact that PARP consumes NAD+ to counteract EMF damage can be an important concern.
Cancer ISN’T the principal Health Threat of EMF
The voltage within your body seems to play a substantial role in health insurance and disease. Your bodys production of electricity allows your cells to communicate and perform basic biological functions essential for your survival. However, the body is made to operate at very specific levels and frequencies.
It appears logical that being surrounded by man-made EMFs which are 1 quintillion times greater than the natural EMF environment of the planet earth may hinder your DNAs capability to receive and transmit biological signals.
As the controversy over EMF damage has centered around whether it could cause cancer, especially brain tumors, this actually isnt your greatest concern. Because the damage is strongly associated with activation of one’s VGCCs, it stands to reason that areas where VGCCs will be the densest will be most susceptible to damage.
Since it happens, the best density of VGCCs are located in your nervous system, the human brain, the pacemaker in your heart and in male testes. Because of this, EMFs will probably donate to neurological and neuropsychiatric59problems, heart and reproductive problems.
This consists of but isn’t limited by cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimers and infertility. Indeed, this is exactly what researchers keep finding, and many of these health problems are more prevalent and kill more folks than brain cancer.
Whats more, seeing just how many are already fighting electromagnetic hypersensitivity, saturating cities and suburban areas with MMW radiation will certainly make the issue more widespread, and make life unbearable for all those already feeling the consequences of wireless radiation.
Media Ploy to Detract From 5G Concerns: Blame the Russians
In a Medium article,60Devra Davis, Ph.D. a well-respected and credentialed researcher on the dangers of cellphone radiation highlights a media trend of writing off scientists who warn about 5G dangers by labeling them untethered alarmists associated with Russian propaganda.
Can it be a coincidence that following on the heels of the NY Times story, the Wall Street Journal and the united kingdom Telegraph have echoed exactly the same smear of guilt by association,she writes,61adding:
These otherwise credible media sources disregard the substantial body of science pinpointing hazards of wireless radiation and 5G detailed in independent journalistic investigations which have appeared extensively in media throughout Europe and been included in major networks
Could the failure to report these critical 5G issues and correct misleading information regarding health ramifications of wireless and 5G in the brand new York Times have anything regarding the their new jv with Verizon in 5G journalism, or the truth that the changing times board of directors includes officials from Facebook, Verizon, Media Lab, along with other stalwarts of the telecom industry, while Carlos Slim, head of a few of the largest telecom firms on earth, has downsized and today owns just 15 percent of its stock?
Davis also highlights an obvious difference between American and Russian scientific expertise pertaining to EMF:
The annals of research on environmentally friendly and public health impacts of radio frequency microwave radiation (wireless radiation) reveals some uneasy parallels with that of tobacco.
In the 1950s and 1960s, scientists who showed the harmful impacts of tobacco found themselves struggling for serious attention and financial support. The validity of these views was only accepted following the toll of sickness and death had become undeniable.
For health impacts from wireless radiation, an identical pattern is emerging. Whenever a U.S. government agency produced positive findings, research on health impacts was defunded.
ANY OFFICE of Naval Research, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and environmentally friendly Protection Agency all once had vibrant research programs documenting dangers of wireless radiation. All found their programs scrapped, reflecting pressure from those that sought to suppress this work.
Russians 50 years of research on electromagnetic radiation because the Cold War has resulted in their clear knowing that this exposure has biological effects. The Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection issued a 2011 Resolution62recommending persons under 18 not work with a cellular phone.
Brain Cancer Risk IS PROBABLE Real
While cardiovascular disease, dementia and infertility overshadow the chance of brain cancer, the chance of cancer still remains, and could be a a lot more significant concern for small children that are growing up surrounded by wireless technologies than we realize.
The truth is, we wont know for certain whether in utero and early cellphone use increase brain cancer rates until ten years or two from now when todays youths have become up. Mounting research suggests cellphone radiation certainly influences your risk, and there are many of compelling anecdotal reports which are hard to ignore.
In her article,63Davis mentions Robert C. Kane, a senior telecom engineer had willingly served as a guinea pig for Motorola along with other companies developing new wireless technologies in the 1980s.
He developed a kind of malignant brain cancer the National Toxicology Program later confirmed was a side-effect of cellphone radiation exposure (see video above). The NTPs results were published in 2018. Before his death in 2002, Kane published the book, Cellphone Radiation Russian Roulette,64where he stated that: 65
Never in history has there been this type of practice once we now encounter with the marketing and distributing of products hostile to the human biological system by a business with foreknowledge of these effects.
FCC Is really a Captured Agency That CAN’T BE Trusted
Davis also highlights another crucial problem, namely the truth that the FCC has been captured by the telecom industry, which has perfected the disinformation strategies utilized by the tobacco industry before it. She writes: 66
[I]n 2015 a Harvard expose tracked the revolving door between your FCC and the telecom industry and figured the FCC is really a captured agency and that Consumer safety, health, and privacy, alongside consumer wallets, have all been overlooked, sacrificed, or raided because of unchecked industry influence.’
The book involved is Captured Agency: The way the Federal Communications Commission Is Dominated by the Industries It Presumably Regulates, compiled by investigative journalist Norm Alster.67
As just one single example, before his role as FCC chairman, Wheeler headed up the CTIA, that is the lobbying group for the wireless industry, which explains his commentary on 5G and just why the FCC doesnt have confidence in studying its health threats and wont await the standards.
The book also shows the way the telecom industry is manipulating public opinion by undermining the credibility of scientists that talk about dangers, cutting funds for research, publishing manipulated studies showing no harm and claiming scientific consensus of no harm when no such consensus actually exists. Naturally, the telecom industry also spends huge amount of money lobbying the FCC on conditions that might impact its important thing.68
5G Threatens Weather Prediction
Interestingly, apart from potential health ramifications, a worldwide 5G network may also threaten our capability to predict weather which, along with putting civilians at an increased risk may also jeopardize the Navy.69In accordance with a paper70in the journal Nature, widespread 5G coverage will prevent satellites from detecting changes in water vapor, that is how meteorologists predict weather changes and storms.
Davis quotes71Stephen English, meteorologist at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts: This is actually the first-time weve seen a threat from what Id call the crown jewels of our frequencies those that we absolutely must defend come what may.
Alas, the FCC ignores such concerns and, in accordance with Davis, weather experts within the U.S. government are increasingly being muzzled. In a letter to the FCC, Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., urge the agency to rein in the expansion of wireless communications in the 24 GHz band because of this.72
KEEP YOURSELF WELL-INFORMED About the HEALTH THREATS of 5G
My book, EMF*D: 5G, Wi-Fi & MOBILE PHONES: Hidden Harms and How exactly to Protect Yourself, discusses EMF dangers, with a thorough resource on current technologies such as for example:
- What EMFs (electromagnetic fields) are actually, where you discover them in your lifestyle, and how they affect you
- The toll that EMFs have already been proven to ingest conditions such as for example cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neuropsychiatric illnesses
- Why youve been largely kept at night concerning this threat to your wellbeing
- Ways to actually repair the damage done by EMFs at a cellular level
- Practical ways of protect yourself as well as your family members from EMFs in the home, at the job, and out on the planet
You may also download a two-page 5G fact sheet73from environmentally friendly Health Trust. On the website, you may also access more information on published scientific tests showing cause for concern.74
To lessen your EMF exposure, go through the suggestions below and implement as much of them as you possibly can. Additional guidance and solutions for mitigating electric and magnetic fields may also be found at the finish of Healthy Wiring Practices,75a document developed by building biologist Oram Miller, whom Ive interviewed with this topic.
In the event that you absolutely will need to have a router, it is possible to place it in the shielded bag you should definitely in use. You can get shielded items online, or make your personal using Swiss Shield fabric. For those who have a notebook without the Ethernet ports, a USB Ethernet adapter will help you to connect to the web with a wired connection.
Originally published onAugust 11, 2022 on Mercola.com
Sources and References
Views expressed in this post will be the opinions of the writer and don’t necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. Epoch Health welcomes professional discussion and friendly debate. To submit an impression piece, please follow these guidelines and submit through our form here.