Until very recently, muscle cars weren’t known to be an economical, green option; instead, these were seen as a raw power & most of this power originated from the big, thirsty engine rumbling away beneath the car’s mile-long hood. Despite several major manufacturers producing and promoting greener options, old-school muscle cars still have an enormous following.
Chevy Hardcore’s Randy Bolig is one particular old-school muscle car enthusiasts. He summed up his and several other’s feelings quite succinctly within an article he wrote about why electric cars weren’t for him. In summing up his love of classic cars, and his dislike of where in fact the automotive industry appears to be heading, Bolig says: “I love to hear a screaming V8 at full song. I love the truth that driving a vintage can be an experience, not only something that needs to be done to access work. In a nutshell, I love old cars. Having said that, I am not just a fan of what the automakers have the auto industry should become battery-powered.”
Although electric is on course to end up being the vehicular norm within the next few decades, enthusiasts shouldn’t worry an excessive amount of. Alongside the classics which are still around, gas-powered behemoths remain rolling off the production line and can continue to achieve this for the near future. As well as the standard models, some manufacturers like Chevrolet remain pushing the boundaries of petroleum power actually, the Motor City-based manufacturer has released an automobile having an engine so big you are prohibited to go on it on the highway.
The world’s biggest passenger car engine
In the standard world, a 6.5-liter engine is known as to be quite large. Chevrolet has made a decision to venture well beyond this and contains crammed something nearer to what you’d find pulling a semi-truck in leading of its 2022 COPO Camaro. As things stand, the COPO’s incredible naturally aspirated 9.4-liter V8 may be the largest you will see powering a production passenger vehicle.
However, size doesn’t invariably translate to performance. Regardless of the enormous level of its cylinders, the COPO Camaro’s 9.4-liter engine only produces around 430 horsepower. If you are searching for raw grunt, deciding on the slightly smaller 5.7-liter COPO Camaro will provide you with yet another 130 horsepower, partially because of efficiency and partially because of the supercharger the 5.7-liter engine has mounted on it. Small engine is suited to Chevvy’s small block platform, as the larger option comes suited to a large block platform much like what the business installed in its vehicles back the 1960s a time that has been arguably the golden age of the muscle car.
If 9.4 liters still seems a touch too small for you personally, and you also have the methods to source and fit a straight larger engine, you have the choice to get the COPO Camaro a rolling chassis. The 9.4-liter COPO Camaro would definitely be considered a talking point in virtually any garage, nonetheless it isn’t cheap. If you need to snag one new, you will probably pay at the very least $105,000 (via Chevrolet). Just like the other COPO Camaros, the 9.4-liter version has a weight-saving carbon fiber hood and the choice of a trunk-loaded parachute for drag racing. But regardless of the extras, the big-engined beast could be the least practical car you can spend six figures on for just one major reason.
You can’t take the 9.4-liter COPO Camaro on the highway
You may use the faster, more costly, smaller-engined versions of the COPO Camaro as an everyday driver rather than suffer any issues beyond the actual fact a parachute is taking on some valuable trunk space and the roll cage is limiting the amount of passengers it is possible to match the cabin. The bigger engined variant does not have that luxury.
As Motor Illustrated explains, the 9.4-liter version is not designed for the road and doesn’t come given a car Identification Number (VIN). It can not be registered, can not be insured such as a regular car, and can not be driven on public roads minus the police turning up and charging the individual driving the plateless powerhouse with a litany of offenses. Instead, the 9.4-liter COPO Camaro’s natural habitat and the only real place it is possible to go on it without falling foul of regulations may be the track or the drag strip.
You might then question why Chevvy has bothered to create a 9.4-liter version of a car that’s less economical, offers worse performance, and is less practical than other versions of the same vehicle. So do we, and only 1 answer involves mind:since it can.