free counter

Unilever accepts short-term hit to competitiveness to push higher prices through

When Unilever updated the marketplace on its first half performance yesterday, the business beat even top-of-the-range forecasts by reported healthy organic sales growth of 8.8%.

Margin for the initial six months of the year which were marked by significant input price inflation in commodities like palm oil dipped, however, not just as much as many were expecting. The companys margin fell 180 basis points to 17%, before consensus market forecast of 16.4%.

How has this been achieved? Unilever has led on pricing in lots of of its geographies and categories.

If we dig into that organic revenue growth number, pricing contributed 9.8% to the very best line but volumes dipped -1.6%. It is a level that it could seem the marketplace and Unilever management are quite happy with for the moment.

Elasticities continue steadily to surprise on the upside, Jeffries analyst Martin Deboo wrote in an email to investors.As important because the price-led beat was that volume elasticities remained low and consistent with our modelling expectations.

Higher prices support brand investment

Commenting on the trade-off between pricing and volumes, Unilever CEO Alan Jope elaborated: We’ve a playbook, which includes been fine-tuned in high-inflation markets through the years. It starts with precision pricing taken quickly and single-mindedly to safeguard the form of the P&L and retain our capability to invest behind our brands. This is actually the correct strategy even though it results in low single-digit volume declines for a while.

Discussing pricing dynamics on a conference call, Jope revealed Unilever has maintained the pricing momentum established in the next 1 / 2 of 2021. We’ve landed increases across all geographies and divisions.

Unilever is ready to sacrifice some volume towards pricing to be able to protect its margin and support brand investment, the principle executive explained.

Our growth has been underpinned by bigger, better innovation and our relentless concentrate on functional product superiority. And our brand investment was up in absolute euro [terms] in the initial half, as planned.

Unilever brands winning market share in retreat

However, higher pricing does come at a price for the buyer goods giant.

As recent Vypr research demonstrates, the brand loyalty of consumers facing the price of living squeeze has been tested.

Rising prices have prompted shoppers to reassess their food and beverage purchases, with a renewed concentrate on pricing and value arriving at the fore. Vypr consumer research shows 50% folks already are now spending less. This number increases to 60% when adjusted for low income households with earnings as high as 25,000 p/a. Looking specifically at drink and food, 30% of individuals reported spending less on groceries. So when people turn to reign within their supermarket bill, they will trade down from brands to private label or value propositions.

This pressure could go a way to explaining why fewer of Unilevers brands are winning share. In the initial quarter of the year 25% of Unilever businesses were expanding share. For the initial half, this number fell to 52%, signalling a steeper Q2 slowdown. Share trends were also patchy. Latin America was up 67%, while food brands in Europe were defined as a weakness.

Business winning for all of us is an extremely harsh and strict measure, that is we only count whenever we are gaining market share. Flat shares for all of us will not count as winning, Jope emphasised.

There are many of cells across Europe where we’ve moved ahead on price and so are watching carefully to make certain that we don’t possess sustained losses of shares. A whole lot in foods actually, Foods Europe. We’ve had several cells where we’ve gone from winning to losing share.

Alarm bells arent ringing at Unilever HQ at this time, however. The business aims to help keep the proportion of brains gaining share above 50%, Jope said, however the priority may be the ability to continue steadily to spend money on our brands.

We have been careful never to push pricing levels to a spot where we compromise the long-term health of the business enterprise. But once we said before, we have been ready to accept a short-term hit to competitiveness occasionally once we lead on pricing.

Read More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker