Russian President Vladimir Putin admitted that nuclear war isn’t a choice on Monday, but his remarks certainly are a stark contrast from previous statements from Russia.
Concerns about Russia using nuclear weapons have become lately amid the Russia-Ukraine war, as experts have said Putin could order their use to attain a quicker victory as his military has struggled to attain his main objectives. But Putin seemed to make an effort to quell these fears in a letter to a conference on the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, in accordance with a written report from Reuters.
“We proceed from the truth that there may be no winners in a nuclear war also it shouldn’t be unleashed, and we are a symbol of equal and indivisible security for several members of the planet community,” Putin wrote.
However, Putin’s letter runs on the strikingly different tone than he along with other Russian authorities have previously taken concerning the possible usage of nuclear weapons.
In previous months, Putin’s allies and Kremlin-aligned Russian state television purchased fears of a nuclear attack to taunt the Westas well concerning make an effort to threaten world leaders who support Ukraine.
When Putin first launched the war on February 24, he warned that any attempt by other countries to hinder his invasion would “cause you to such consequences you have never encountered in your history,” a remark taken by many to become a veiled nuclear threat.
Kremlin Previously Said Nuclear Threat MUST NOT BE ‘Underestimated’
While Russian authorities haven’t made direct threats of nuclear war lately, they will have made veiled warnings concerning the possibility. For example, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned in April that while Russia really wants to avoid nuclear war, he viewed the risks of such as for example “considerable.”
“The chance is serious, real,” he added. “And we should not underestimate it.”
Vyacheslav Volodin, the top of Russia’s Duma, said in June that when Europe provided Ukraine with nuclear weapons, they might “disappear” after Polish authorities said they will have the right to supply Ukraine with the weapons, though they will have not done so.
“[Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw] Sikorski provokes a nuclear conflict in the heart of Europe. He will not take into account the future of either Ukraine or Poland. If his proposals are implemented, these countries will go away, in addition to Europe. He must be examined by way of a psychiatrist, pass the mandate and stay in the home under supervision,” Volodin said.
Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov in addition has said that Russia would use nuclear weapons if it felt threatened.
“Well, we’ve an idea of domestic security, and it’s really public,” Peskov said on CNN in March. “It is possible to read all of the known reasons for nuclear arms to be utilized. So if it’s an existential threat, a threat for the country, then it may be used relative to our concept.”
Russian State TV Taunts West With Nuclear Threat
Russian state television, backed by the Kremlin, has turned into a platform that frequently discusses the prospects of nuclear war, using its pro-Putin hosts often talking about a real chance for Russia using nuclear weapons.
In June, Russian state television personality Vladimir Solovyov warned there will be a “massive nuclear strike” that only “mutants” would survive if the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) continued supporting Ukraine.
“If everything keeps progressing just how it is, a couple of mutants in Lake Baikal will survive. The others will undoubtedly be destroyed in an enormous nuclear strike,” he said, discussing among the world’s deepest lakes, situated in Siberia.
In April, a panel of Russian analysts on state-owned Russia-1 laughed at the thought of a nuclear attack contrary to the USA. One panelist said that “objects just like the city of NY” will be “completely gone with one rocket.” Panelists also have proposed using nuclear weapons against Finland and Sweden amid their bid to become listed on NATO.
Sometimes, Russian state TV has even made direct threats about using nuclear weapons.
“You’ll get a nuclear strike in the event that you gather some type of a peacekeeping contingent by NATO or opt to relocate it somewhere, and so forth and so forth. This is likely to be considered a nuclear war!” a Russian television host said in a video that surfaced on Twitter in-may.