free counter

Whistle-blower Testifies in DC…

A Twitter whistle-blower on the Hill

Peiter Zatko, Twitters former head of security, is scheduled to testify today prior to the Senate Judiciary Committee about his explosive whistle-blower report claiming that the social networking does not protect user data and is susceptible to hackers. Zatko, who’s referred to as Mudge, has had center stage in Elon Musks legal fight to obtain out from the Twitter deal since he went public last month and both sides will undoubtedly be watching the hearing because they gear up for the October trial. In a great twist, the shareholder vote on Twitters sale to Musk can be today. Expect it to be approved.

Musk is currently citing Zatkos accusations as grounds he will be able to escape the offer. Judge Kathaleen McCormick, who’s overseeing the trial, ruled the other day that Musk can amend his case against Twitter to include Zatkos claims. Musks lawyers have finally sent Twitter several letters citing Zatko being an additional reason the offer ought to be called off. The initial said that Twitter must have disclosed Zatkos claims in a securities filing, and that when Twitter is in violation of an F.T.C. consent decree, as Zatko claims, the business could possibly be breaching the terms of the offer. Musks lawyers later followed around say a $7.8 million payout by Twitter to Zatko was also a breach. Twitter contested all those claims.

The Twitter deal is tangential to the Zatko hearing. Zatkos security warnings about Twitter are likely the committees central focus. If these claims are accurate, they could show dangerous data privacy and security risks of Twitter users all over the world, Senators Dick Durbin and Chuck Grassley said in announcing Zatkos testimony.

Will Zatkos accusations constitute a material adverse effect, justifying Musk walking from the offer? How terrible everything is for society doesnt matter for the lawsuit, Ann Lipton of Tulane Law School told DealBook. Zatkos testimony will undoubtedly be pertinent to Musks legal team only when he lays out problems specific to Twitter which could cause the business real financial harm, or demonstrates that Twitter committed fraud with misleading statements in its regulatory filings or correspondence concerning the deal, Lipton said. If thats false, Musk will need to rethink his technique for wriggling out from the deal.


Goldman Sachs may lead a wave of Wall Street job cuts. Yesterday, DealBooks Lauren Hirsch broke the news headlines that the lender planned to lay off a huge selection of workers the moment in a few days. A slowdown in deals has led many Wall Street firms, which had paused layoffs through the pandemic, to summarize they have way too many bankers.

The E.U. moves toward rationing power. The political blocs executive arm is weighing asking member countries to impose mandatory targets for cutting power use, its latest effort to increase fuel reserves and keep a lid on prices. Members are anticipated to rebel, but news of the deliberations helped lower gas prices.

Uber can pay NJ $100 million in back taxes, plus interest. Hawaii had accused the ride-hailing company of misclassifying its drivers for a long time as contractors rather than employees. But Uber denied that the payment signaled it had been retreating from its argument that its drivers shouldnt be classified as employees.

Pelotons co-founder is leaving. John Foley, the home-fitness companys executive chairman and former C.E.O., is resigning immediately; no reason was presented with. His departure comes as Peloton struggles to show itself around, having lost profit six consecutive quarters.

Bob Iger joins Joshua Kushners capital raising firm. The former Disney C.E.O. can be a venture partner at Thrive Capital, in charge of finding deals and advising portfolio companies. Its the most recent post-retirement gig for Iger since he stepped down from Disney this past year.

All eyes on todays C.P.I. number

Today, prior to the opening bell, the federal government will report consumer price inflation data for August. After months of soaring prices, consumers got a reprieve in July. Economists believe last month was more of exactly the same, with inflation falling to a still-high 8 percent annual rate, down from the peak of 9 percent in June.

Many on Wall Street, though, believe any relief will undoubtedly be temporary. I believe the largest mistaken belief investors have today is that people will go back to pre-Covid pricing, Greg Jensen, co-chief investment officer of the hedge fund Bridgewater, told attendees of the SALT investment conference in NY yesterday. We have been in the first stages of a global that’s less globalized, more energy stressed, more politicized. Jensen delivered a bearish prediction of stubbornly high inflation, recession and also stagflation.

The good thing: Falling gas prices are tamping down inflation. Elevated energy prices become some sort of consumption tax, slowing other purchasing. Now the contrary is going on. Bank of America reported on Friday that shelling out for gasoline by its card customers had dropped for 13 straight weeks, by 25 percent, and that has been fueling a near-term consumer bounce.

The bad news: Lower gas prices could ultimately result in more inflation later on. More spending power, because of cheaper gasoline, could lift consumer demand for other goods, wrote Aditya Bhave, a worldwide and U.S. economist at Bank of America.

Main Street remains gloomy. In a Goldman Sachs survey of American smaller businesses, released today, 77 percent of respondents said inflationary pressures had increased in the last 90 days, hurting their capability to hire and expand as customers scale back. Nintety-one percent of these surveyed said inflation could influence how they vote in Novembers midterm election, because they size up the field for probably the most pro-small business candidate.

For more on todays C.P.I. report, start to see the Timess special briefing, which is updated during the day.

Members of Congress continue steadily to trade lots of stocks

The problem of lawmakers stock trading along with other securities, despite potential conflicts of interest making use of their legislative duties, is a growing topic of contention outside and inside of Congress. A fresh analysis by THE DAYS shows just how pervasive that trading is.

Nearly a fifth of current senators or representatives reported trades, either independently or by family, between 2019 and 2021. THE CHANGING TIMES identified over 3,700 transactions, or even more than 10 percent of trades by members of Congress recorded in the Capitol Trades database, which were potentially problematic.

The timing alone will raise questions about some transactions. The Timess analysis flagged trades that intersected with lawmakers legislative committee responsibilities. Two examples stood out:

  • Senator Tommy Tuberville, Republican of Alabama, bought and sold cattle futures despite sitting on the Senate Agriculture Committee.

  • Representative Alan Lowenthal, Democrat of California, reported that his wife sold shares in Boeing your day prior to the House Transportation Committee, which he sits, released damaging findings concerning the 737 Max crashes.

Both lawmakers said the trades were handled by stockbrokers without their involvement.

Congress has proposed methods to tighten trading rules because of its members, with the problem gaining rare bipartisan support. But, THE CHANGING TIMES reports, whether some of those bills will clear both chambers of Congress and reach President Bidens desk this season is very much indeed in doubt.

Nobodys likely to make original content for Instagram. It just doesnt make any sense.

Landen Purifoy, a 22-year-old creator of short videos, who says he is able to attract more viewers producing content for TikTok, YouTube along with other social media marketing platforms than he is able to for Instagram Reels.

A constitutional challenge to the F.T.C.s very existence

An increasing number of companies are arguing that the F.T.C. doesn’t have the constitutional authority to police them.

The tobacco company Altria and the e-cigarette maker Juul raised this argument yesterday within their fight a partial merger challenge that the F.T.C. lost in its administrative court earlier this season, and is currently appealing. At the hearing, Noah Phillips, an F.T.C. commissioner, cited a landmark 1935 Supreme Court ruling on the F.T.C.s constitutionality, asking what has changed since that time. The justices themselves might soon answer fully the question.

The Supreme Court has recently expressed skepticism of federal agencies power. In June, the courts majority ruled that environmentally friendly Protection Agency had overreached when limiting carbon emissions. That decision signaled definitively that the courts conservative majority may also be skeptical of the reach of other executive agencies and there is absolutely no shortage of litigants teeing up similar arguments in federal and administrative courts with the hopes of taking them to the very best for review.

The justices will soon hear arguments on an integral jurisdictional part of these claims. The body-cam developer Axon Enterprise, that is challenging an F.T.C. merger review, wants the Supreme Court to state that it could fight the commission in federal court as the administrative case is underway, instead of waiting before internal procedure is complete. The problem will undoubtedly be heard plus a case from an accountant facing S.E.C. charges who’s challenging that commissions constitutionality. Even though Supreme Court will never be deciding the underlying questions if the agencies and their processes are constitutional a ruling for Axon and the accountant may lead to a tidal wave of federal court challenges, among that your justices could find yourself reviewing.

The F.T.C. lacks constitutionally valid authority to initiate litigation, lawyers for Walmart recently wrote in a motion to dismiss charges that it violated telemarketing rules. They argue that many has changed about how exactly the F.T.C. operates since that 1935 Supreme Court decision, and that its time and energy to reconsider. What goes without saying, following the last rather dramatic term, is that the justices may be inclined to agree and wanting to take up one of these brilliant cases.




Best of the others

  • A child formula recall scare could be over, but supplies of the merchandise are running desperately low in lots of elements of the U.S. (NYT)

  • Columbia dropped from No. 2 to No. 18 in the most recent U.S. News and World Report college rankings, after admitting to miscalculating data in its submissions to the ratings. (NYT)

  • HBO cleaned up at the Emmys again, but television executives fear for what layoffs and tighter production spending means for his or her industry. (NYT)

  • Kanye West says hell go it alone in his apparel endeavors once his contracts with Adidas and Gap expire. (Bloomberg)

Thanks for reading! Well see you tomorrow.

Wed like your feedback. Please email thoughts and suggestions to [emailprotected].

Wed like your feedback! Please email thoughts and suggestions to [emailprotected].

The post Twitter Whistle-blower IS DEFINED to Testify in Washington appeared first on NY Times.

Read More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker